Foundations of Physics, Quantum Gravity and new Education Paradigms

This study project will examine the various possible interpretations of the foundations of physics and explore new forms of collaboration that should involve not
only physicists and mathematicians, but also philosophers, historians, linguists, computer scientists, etc.
Everyone is invited to participate to the group
discussion, analysis, and innovative experimentation through an exchange of ideas with various collaborative forms to be determined. No fixed ideas and procedures
are used, since everything should depend from the individual creative potential of who joins the project.

The reason why this project will focus on these topics is that, contrary to popular belief, the foundations of physics are facing one of its deepest intellectual
crisis. While applied physics experienced a tremendous development, and several new discoveries from the micro- to macro-cosmos revolutionized our understanding of
the physical world, the progress in the conceptual foundations of modern theoretical physics stagnated. On one side the theory of relativity, quantum mechanics (QM)
and the standard model (SM) of particle physics, showed to be quite successful theories which were proven to be correct by several experiments. On the other side it
is now almost half a century that there is a lack of real progress in the conceptual foundations that are supposed to unify them. Relativity and QM both describe
efficiently the world, and yet they seem conceptually incompatible. Relativity is a deterministic theory that describes well the force of gravity, but seems to have
nothing to do with electromagnetic and nuclear forces. QM instead is a non-deterministic theory which describes well electromagnetic and nuclear forces, and even
unifies them in the SM, but refuses to encompass gravity. It is now known that the SM, even though it is an extraordinarily successful and tested theory, can’t be
the ultimate theory of matter. First of all because it contains several free arbitrary parameters, apparently fine tuned for the emergence of life just by an
extraordinary coincidence. Moreover, astronomers discovered that dark matter and dark energy make up 95% of the universe, but both came as a surprise since the SM
accounts only for the remaining 5%. This suggests that the SM isn't the whole story and we must go beyond relativity, QM and the SM itself.

However, any attempt to do so in the last four decades failed. Physicists worldwide tried to conceive of new ‘quantum gravity" theories, like superstrings, other
supersymmetric theories, canonical quantum gravity, etc. But these led only towards an even deeper crises, since most of it are far beyond any possibility of
experimental verification or, those which make predictions in the range of detection with present technologies, have been ruled out experimentally. In fact,
predictions at low energy seem to be disconfirmed by recent experiments at particle accelerators like the LHC and by cosmological observations, which did not find
any evidence that supports theories like superstrings and supersymmetry.

This led to a plethora of alternative and exotic new theories, most quite complex and mathematically abstract, which try to solve this problem (e.g. extensions of
superstrings as M-Theory, AdS/CFT correspondence, the holographic principle, “multiverses”, etc.). But they resulted in even more strange paradoxes (e.g., black hole
information loss, "firewalls") and overall the net impression is that of a great confusion and incertitude, which clearly signals a deep foundational as
methodological crises in theoretical physics. Slowly but steadily it is becoming clear that the last 40 years of attempts to establish a new conceptual foundation
that could lead us beyond the SM, went in the wrong direction. Huge financial and human resources were invested for the exploration of theories that probably have
nothing to do with what really nature wants to tell us. We are not making any tangible progress towards a quantum gravity theory.

There is a large consensus that it is likely that one of the roots of the problem has to be found in an inadequate way of seeing and conceiving the material world
(e.g. our notion of what space-time, matter or forces are, and if these might not be fundamental physical entities but emergent properties). Everything indicates
that the basic pillars of physics must be modified and a change of paradigm must intervene. New ideas, insights, and original as groundbreaking intuitions are
necessary to get out of the impasse. The only way out seems to involve profound revision of fundamental physical principles.

But there is also another big hurdle that stands in the way towards this aim. The problem might not be only technical, but much more of a sociological, pedagogical,
didactical and political nature in our universities. Because our post-modern way of doing science is deeply problematic too. We should seriously question ourselves
if there might not be something wrong inherently in our modern way of conceiving research and academic education. What is missing in our present social and academic
structures are the free ‘seers’ who, like Copernicus, Galileo, Newton, Einstein, and many others, understood the fallacies of the conventional thinking and foresaw
the new paradigm by looking further. But present academic systems are precisely that kind of power structures that inhibit the freedom of the ‘seers’ and refuse them
free expression. Present colleges and universities allow mainly for scientists spending their careers making incremental additions and subtle changes to existing
knowledge, not new paradigm changes. Our academic system has become increasingly authoritarian and accurately expunged the free 'seer' and independent thinker.

We urgently need a university system capable of going beyond the status quo. where students can express themselves, everyone with his or her unique own potential,
and which is able to liberate talents, individual freedom and everyone’s “inner call”. A system that has no hierarchical structures and encourages free self-
initiative. A platform for a free expression of the individual potential and the development of one’s own personality. A place where new forms of learning and
teaching are practiced. An environment for a lifelong learning by doing, where a creative learning by teaching is possible, and where everyone can learn to learn.
Which means, that it should be a place without any compulsion to learn, where everyone is free to progress by learning what is felt must be learned, and without an
academic path forced onto the students from an advisor, professor, institution or generation old bureaucratic laws (a description in more detail of these problems,
and a proposal of what a new type of “Free Progress University” might look like, I have outlined here:

Only in such a context new successful directions of research can be achieved, that could lead us towards more profound insights in theoretical physics. This wants to
be a meeting point for an independent group of students, researchers and thinkers, that will study, discuss and teach themselves and others the conceptual
foundations and philosophy of QM, relativity, quantum field theories, the standard model of particle physics, and beyond. A free congregation of physicists,
mathematicians, philosophers and historians of science, who will work together, but independently from other departments, research teams, colleges or university
structures and far from external pressures. A free research center in the conceptual foundations and philosophy of physics, where everyone can study and work freely
by applying new conceptual, pedagogical and didactical paradigms.

If you want to participate or have any questions please contact Marco Masi, the initiator, or FUFF


FUFF: please click on contact link at the top of the page.