this is an example result from the
experimental simulation model you find under the adress |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
http://fuff.org/data/cr0.html |
|
|
the
miracle of math(sk)s |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is a
simplified model - however, I want to show a mathematical effect at an
uncomplicated example. |
|
It is not
about the precise numbers. |
|
|
|
Imagine a
population where each already infected person has a probability of infecting
1.3 others within the following 15 days. |
|
|
We start
with 1 infected person |
|
Here is
what happens in this model: |
|
|
|
one
cluster, all persons are average persons |
|
population: |
80,000,000 |
|
devide: |
100 |
0 |
|
depth: |
1 |
|
days: |
15 |
|
spread: |
1.3 |
|
|
|
|
It will
take some time, 1.3 is not much, for example because some social(physical)
distancing is in place. So in the average case, after 300 days the wave will
finally come and 35 million will become infected within roughly 200 days |
|
|
|
Now,
imagine, the people all wear masks. Masks that maybe are not perfect, but in
our example they reduce that spread potential by 15% (only 15%!). So it is
now 1.105 |
|
Does not
seem much, eh? |
|
|
|
Now see
what happens |
|
|
one
cluster, all persons are average persons |
|
population: |
80,000,000 |
|
devide: |
100 |
0 |
|
depth: |
1 |
|
days: |
15 |
|
spread: |
1.105 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
we even have to revert to a
wider |
|
|
time scale to see the full result: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Two
effects: It takes almost double the time and the spread is exhausted at below
15 million infections. |
|
That is not
15% less. It is more than 57% less! |
|
|
|
The effect
is even more stunning when exercised close to the tipping point of 1. |
|
Let's
assume the above mentioned 1.105 scenario is the one without the masks. |
|
Now we are
reducing that by 15% through the masks: |
|
|
|
one
cluster, all persons are average persons |
|
population: |
80,000,000 |
|
devide: |
100 |
0 |
|
depth: |
1 |
|
days: |
15 |
|
spread: |
0.93925 |
|
|
|
|
Well, the
whole thing dies out sooner or later - at an average of 16 infected people |
|
|
That is not
15% less. That is almost 100% less. |
|
|
How that? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spreading
the virus is a generational model opf multiplications. One person spread it
to x persons, and those will spread it again to x persons each. And so
on. |
|
So every
influence on the spread multiplies in the following generations and multipies
again and so on. |
|
|
Think of
the easy example of 4 generations and a virus that each person spreads to 4
others. |
|
the first
person spreads to 4, those to 4 each, which makes it 16, and those to 4 each,
what is 64. |
|
After 4
generations you have 1+4+16+64=85 infected |
|
|
Now this
is reduced by 25% through some kind of behavioural change, lockdown, masks,
whatever. |
|
now the
first person spreads to 3, those to 3 each, which makes it 9, and those to 3
each, what is 27. |
|
After 4
generations you now have 'only' 1+3+9+27=40 infected. |
|
Which is
not 25% less but more than 50% less. |
|
|
After 12
'generations' you have a whopping effect: |
|
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
|
|
4 |
1 |
5 |
21 |
85 |
341 |
1365 |
5461 |
21845 |
87381 |
349525 |
1398101 |
5592405 |
22369621 |
|
3 |
1 |
4 |
13 |
40 |
121 |
364 |
1093 |
3280 |
9841 |
29524 |
88573 |
265720 |
797161 |
|
800
thousand vs. 22 million. The reduced curve is still exponential but that is a
different quality. |
|
->
Disclaimer: In complexer reality the extent of this effect would depend very
much on the potential, the size of the country, overlapping of clusters etc.
This is not accounted for in this example, but it is in the models at the top
of this page. |
|
|
This huge
'success' comes because the effect multiplies itself with each
generation. |
|
From the
first to the second generation it is indeed 25% less - or: 0.75 times the
original value. |
|
But from
first to third generation it is now 0.75*0.75 of the original spread, which
is 0.5625. And from the first to the fourth it is 0.75*0.75*0.75 (=0.4219) |
|
And so on. |
|
|
So over
time this effect can become huge. |
|
|
However,
in our model a step down from 4 to 3 in spread does only help a little. |
|
It gives
us more time, but the eventual outcome will still be a quite rapid infection
of almost the whole population. A few millions will be saved from it, though. |
|
|
So, just
wearing masks alone would be no solution. |
|
But
wearing masks in the right context could have a huge effect as shown above. |
|
Even if a
clustered model (closer to reality) will soften the effect a bit. |
|
|
|
experiment
yourself… |
|
http://fuff.org/data/cr0.html |
|
|
*DISCLAIMER |
|
again:
this is a simplified model to show some mathematical effects and properties
and inspire collaboration and your efforts. It is not a proper simulation to
base decisions upon. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|